GRE Cheating
🇨🇳 "Do All Proxy Services Use the Same Remote Access Technology?" - A GRE Proxy Test Case Study with Detailed Process and Honest Feedback from Chinese Client 'Lisa Chen'.
We know we charge more than others, but there’s a reason for it—scroll down to see what makes us worth it!
Note: The screenshots are in Chinese as we were serving a Chinese customer.
GRE Proxy Testing Client Background
Lisa Chen (alias) is a client from mainland China who planned to apply for a master's program in computer science at a top U.S. university. Due to the competitive application process, she needed a GRE score of 330+ to improve her chances. However, academic pressure and limited prep time prevented her from preparing fully for the test. After researching several options, Lisa decided in October 2024 to use Examinator's high-end GRE proxy testing service.
It's worth noting that Lisa initially considered some lower-cost testing help providers but found their explanations of service details, technical methods, and security unclear, with no credible success stories. She ultimately chose Daisy due to their comprehensive technical support, risk management strategy, and numerous positive reviews from GRE cheating service clients.
Initial Consultation and Goal Setting
During her first conversation with the Daisy team, Lisa clearly stated her needs: she aimed for a GRE score above 330 and needed to complete the test by December 1. She was particularly concerned about security and wanted to ensure that her actions would not be detected. In response, the Daisy team outlined the service process, including technical details, equipment requirements, and risk control measures, ensuring her that her personal information and actions would remain confidential.
For pricing, we offered several score-based packages. Lisa chose the 335+ package, which cost several thousand dollars, split into a 50% deposit and a final payment upon meeting the target score. Compared to some “low-cost, high-score” services, our fees were higher, but the professionalism and success rate assured Lisa, making this an important reason for her decision.
Significant Differences in Remote Technology Across Proxy Services: We Succeed Where Others Fail!
When choosing a proxy testing service, there are major differences in the technology used by different providers. Some lower-cost providers use basic software tools that may not bypass test monitoring systems and detection. For example, some remote software can only display limited interfaces or can be easily flagged by test security systems. In contrast, high-end providers like Examinator invest in untraceable, low-risk software, with multi-layer optimizations for remote control to prevent detection. These technical differences impact both service success rates and client risk levels. Choosing a provider with strong technical expertise and risk control is a safer investment.
For instance, other agents’ remote software couldn’t display the Bluebook interface when proxying the SAT.
Many other testing service providers experience remote software failures and turn to us for help:
GRE Proxy Testing Preparation and Technical Support
Once the service was confirmed, Lisa began preparing her equipment as advised by the Daisy team, including a high-performance laptop and stable high-speed internet. Initially, she planned to use her old laptop, but it failed due to outdated software and a low-resolution camera. She then borrowed a compliant device, which the tech team helped configure.
For the environment setup, Lisa followed the team’s instructions to ensure a clutter-free space, proper lighting, and compliance with ETS requirements. She also prepared two backup internet connections to handle any unexpected network issues.
Technical Testing and Mock Runs
One week before the exam, the Daisy team conducted multiple tests and mock runs to familiarize Lisa with the process. She installed remote control software that allowed them to operate in an undetectable mode during the test. Although she encountered permission issues during installation, the team helped her resolve them.
Lisa’s network slowed after connecting to a VPN, but the team set up a professional VPN node and optimized her network remotely. After testing, her setup met the necessary standards for efficient and discreet testing.
GRE Exam Day Process and Execution
On test day, Lisa completed a final equipment check with the tech team an hour before the exam to ensure everything was functioning correctly. Her device was connected via VPN, and she completed the ETS check-in.
Shortly after the test began, Lisa faced unstable network issues, causing screen lag and delayed loading times. The team identified the problem as VPN node overload and quickly switched to a backup, restoring stability. Though this disruption made Lisa slightly anxious, the team’s quick response allowed her to continue smoothly.
Throughout the exam, the Daisy team monitored the screen via remote control. Lisa received answers covertly and entered them at a natural pace. For the writing section, the proxy crafted a unique response, which Lisa typed as instructed, resulting in a high writing score that pleased her greatly.
Despite unexpected events, Lisa completed all sections successfully and verified her unofficial score of 33X, achieving her goal.
GRE Score, Feedback, and Lessons Learned
Days later, Lisa received her official score, and her writing score was exceptionally high!
Lisa praised the service’s professionalism and security. In her feedback, she mentioned that the Daisy team’s technical guidance was clear, especially with equipment setup and process optimization. She noted, “Although there were some unexpected issues during the test, the team responded quickly, resolving network problems so I could focus on completing the exam.” She also appreciated the team’s calm and efficient handling of issues, which reassured her.
Lisa emphasized that she initially considered lower-cost providers but found they lacked proper security measures and technical support. Some only provided answers without addressing monitoring system detection, creating a high risk of exposure. Additionally, low-cost services often lack clear refund or score guarantees, leaving clients unprotected if goals aren’t met.
She concluded: “Rather than risking it with cheap services, it’s better to choose a trusted investment. Daisy’s team gave me peace of mind; their service was worth it.”
GRE Score and Feedback
Initially, Lisa’s feedback seemed AI-generated, but after a rewrite, it was much more genuine:
Due to the tight timeline of the application season, I decided to opt for GRE proxy testing. I researched several specialized services on Google and inquired about prices, procedures, and security measures based on my personal situation. When I reached out to Daisy, I immediately felt a significant difference. Her official website showcased various genuine reviews, detailed process explanations, and a deposit-and-balance payment system that offered reassurance. The private communication channels provided a professional feel. During our conversations, Daisy was incredibly patient, answering all my questions promptly, explaining their advantages, and even proactively offering to address my concerns through a voice call. After thorough comparisons, I decided to choose Daisy—not because of the price but because she gave me a unique sense of trust that others couldn’t.
After paying the deposit, I began preparing my computer. My device was quite old and required multiple adjustments, including reinstalling the system and even switching to a new computer. The technical team had to repeatedly assist with installation and checks. Throughout this process, Daisy was highly responsible and ensured I clearly understood what I needed to do. On the exam day, my computer malfunctioned again, which made me extremely anxious. However, Daisy remained calm, promptly contacted the technical team, and successfully resolved the issue before the test started. She also guided me on how to face the camera, emphasized key steps during the whiteboard check, and asked me to practice with her multiple times, which helped me feel composed and confident during the exam.
Once the test began, the proxy test-taker was excellent. Despite my internet disconnecting three or four times, they patiently communicated with me through shared documents, advising me to inform the proctor and reconnect promptly each time. They also reminded me to pace my responses carefully, avoid rushing, and emphasized not confirming completion with the proctor until I had properly submitted all answers.
After the test, I felt anxious because I had used a VPN for my mainland location and forgot to inform the proctor, fearing it might affect my score. Daisy reassured me, advising patience and explaining that the "checked in" and "score not available" status on the website usually indicated no issues. Finally, eight days after the test, my scores were released—an exceptionally high result of 16X+1XX, with X in writing. This achievement significantly eased my application season, allowing me to focus on other materials. I can’t imagine how long it would have taken to prepare and achieve such a score on my own—likely more than six months. Thanks to Daisy’s support and expertise, I now have more time to work on other aspects of my application. Her professionalism is truly unmatched!
Summary and Insights
Lisa Chen’s case demonstrates the full GRE proxy testing process from consultation to success. The Daisy team’s technical expertise, strict risk control, and attentive customer service helped Lisa achieve her target score. This case shows the value of premium service and trustworthiness.
For future clients, Lisa’s experience highlights the importance of focusing on safety and expertise over price alone. Low-cost services often come with risks, while high-end services like Daisy’s provide complete support and security. This is not just a successful test, but a solid step towards future academic and career goals.
